Discussion in 'SOCOM Community Nights' started by Swill, Jun 8, 2016.
Have you ever actually done this? It's pretty fun!
You're just NOW saying this?!?!? That happened 9 pages ago... Hahaha!
I never said the be-all end-all determining factor is only genetics. ALL I'm saying is mental capacity plays a role just like in most other aspects of life, no matter what you do, video games, sports, etc. Someone's skill ceilings in all aspects in life have certain limitations and all people's ceilings are different.
Video games are miniscule and may be pointless (unless you make a living off competitive gaming) but it applies nonetheless.
That's all well and true, but it's not significant enough to be the difference maker, meaning it's irrelevant to use as some kind of argument in a debate.
I think you misunderstand me. The debate itself is wonderful. It's an interesting topic. The reasoning he was trying to use and the argument he was making, that genetics is important enough of a difference when getting kills in SOCOM, is laughable, and absurd. Not the debate itself.
Code 9 is child's play compared to my dna.
I never said it is only for getting kills in SOCOM, but it surely applies for someone's potential "SOCOM IQ" if you will. I believe the scientific basis to "talent" would be genetics. In Socom, a talented player can reach a high level of play much faster than the rest of the pack and compute things in their mind at a higher level and faster rate than the average player.
You either believe talent exists or you don't, if someone can be talented in sports then talent can exist in other areas too. I don't specify only to Socom because I believe a talented Socom player can pick up any video game and very likely become good at it faster than the average Joe.
I hate that I am joining in this, but I just have to echo what you are saying.
I dont know what the initial argument or disagreement was, but if the point that is being argued is that there is not a cognitive advantage to smarter and more intelligent people when playing or performing any task that requires mental acuity, then I have to wholeheartedly agree with your position.
Its an unfortunate fact in this world that some people just suck at life and some people are successful at life. And the common denominator in this regard is genetics. Smarter people are better at shit than people who arent as smart as them. Its pretty obvious. The biological advantages that allow genetically superior people to excel in other areas of life would also apply to a video game. Its just another area of competition where the Alphas are separated from the Betas.
I didnt play Socom for more than 10 years........
And immediately upon my return, I won not one, but TWO MVPs in back to back weeks.
Now obviously my skills had eroded over such a long period of time. So the only thing that allowed me to still dominate the field the way I did was my superior stock. Its just something people are going to have to come to grips with. There are levels in society. Just be comfortable with the level you are on based on your ability.
Im like the Ivan Drago of Socom and all the other players are a bunch of Apollo's.
Socom Source is Back! http://ssr.gameme.com/ twitch.tv/roidz_ct
Top notch contribution.
Did you go there? I was sort of baffled yet again and it's hard for me to be confused. So was that just a page to showcase they're still playing it somewhere? Just looked like a gross sabermetrics page for a game from long lost. I dunno. If they are still playing it, I hope they fixed the explosive weaponry.
The argument wasn't whether or not people can have different genetics that provide different advantages over others. They obviously can. The argument was whether or not genetics, in the context of SOCOM, is significant enough of a difference to use as an argument to claim that that's what makes the biggest difference between someone getting 5 kills versus 15 kills.
It's most definitely not.
Talent doesn't exist. Again, no one is born naturally good at something. As humans, we're all born with a relatively equal footing (Except in extreme cases such as the mentally handicapped or Sevants). Top level competitors become top level competitors because of the time, effort, work-rate, commitment, and sacrifices they make to refine their skills at their craft. Even Conor McGregor, one of the best fighters in the world, agrees:
"There’s no talent here, this is hard work. This is an obsession. Talent does not exist, we are all equal as human beings. You could be anyone if you put in the time. You will reach the top, and that is that. I am not talented, I am obsessed."
As someone who works with professional competitors all over the world on a weekly basis for a living, I can tell you with 100% absolute certainty that this is true.
So, again. Yes, people can be born with slight advantages in terms of genetic advantages, whether they be mental or physical. However, unless it's an extreme case, those genetic advantages aren't what make the most significant difference between people. What makes the difference is things that anyone can do: Repetition, work, commitment, sacrifice, and a slew of other skills that anyone can apply. SOCOM is no different.
I disagree. Prior to winning MVP in my first game back after a more than 10 year absense, I hadnt played Socom at all.
The only possible explanation for me dominating the other players and outshining everone else so much that I was able to win MVP in my very first game back is my superior genetics. Im just from better stock.
Just like the peasants who worked the fields for their royal masters before us, everyone must know their place........
I'm willing to guarantee that, if you play tonight, you won't get MVP on any map that isn't a Breach map lol.
You could put in all the time and effort you want and you wont become Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant, etc etc. Hell, someone could put in all the time and effort in the world and they wouldnt make the fucking team on a college squad.
You cant put in enough "practice" and become Da Vinci, Mozart, Bach, Michaelangelo, and on and on. Those people had an amazing talent that they were born with.
And WHEN I do win MVP on a non breach map, you must then change your signature to "Mack has superior genetics".
Don't forget that Michael Jordan wasn't even good enough to make his high school team. Again, you're simply wrong.
Naming Da Vinci, Mozart, Bach, and Michaelangelo is a terrible example because I already said that you can't count extreme examples. Again, I didn't say that people can't be born with mental/physical genetic advantages over others. I said that, outside of extreme examples, the overwhelming majority of people are born on a relatively equal footing and the genetic differences between people is minimal and non-significant.
Jordan didnt make his high school team because his body hadnt matured to the point where he was physically superior to his competion. No matter how much "hard work and practice" he put in, if he wasnt 6'6" and able to jump out of the gym, he would never have been the player he became.
By your rationale if a 5'3" guy from Japan worked as hard as Michael Jordan he would be able to accomplish what Jordan did.
Now, theres plenty of 6'6" athletic freaks who can jump out of the gym who never amount to anything because they dont have the drive and determination to be the best they can be. But the genetic tools have to be there in the first place for them to even have a shot.
You sound like the pick up artist guys who charge money to a bunch of fat ugly betas and convince them they can go out and pick up top shelf trim if they just use the proper techniques and conversation. Nothing can overcome genetics. If you are broke and ugly, you arent picking up any bitches. Period.
Im not saying that to truly reach full potential hard work isnt also necessary, but if you dont have the foundation to begin with, it just doesnt matter.
Separate names with a comma.